← California

Tap water quality report

South Montebello Irrigation Dist.

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
17
detected
15,021
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0201 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOA 0.0082 µg/L 3/4 2024
PFBS 0.0049 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0066 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0067 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfda 0.0037 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
7.02 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
217/265 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2486 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3000 µg/L
54/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
50/50 LCR 2025
Fluoride
319 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
6.35 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.5 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Lithium
18.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/4 UCMR-5 2024
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CORRALES, ALBERTO
Phone
323-721-4735
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about South Montebello Irrigation Dist.

Is South Montebello Irrigation Dist. tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in South Montebello Irrigation Dist.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Montebello Irrigation Dist.'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Lead, Fluoride, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Montebello Irrigation Dist. serve?

South Montebello Irrigation Dist. reports serving 15,021 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has South Montebello Irrigation Dist. had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for South Montebello Irrigation Dist., of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.