← California

Tap water quality report

Paradise Ranch Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
21
detected
360
people served
25
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

25
health-based violations
34
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-04-01 → 2000-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-04-01 → 2000-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-04-01 → 1997-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-04-01 → 1997-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
5900 µg/L 148%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8400 µg/L
488/563 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1435 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4200 µg/L
152/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
43.3 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
78/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
120.5 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
74/79 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
25.1 µg/L 167%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 56 µg/L
47/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
9.975 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
46/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
5.31 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
24/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
26.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
55.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
8.3589 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.089 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2013
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
20.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
105.5 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.9 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
0.3000 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
2/79 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.3000 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/80 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
53 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ZARNEGIN, BO
Phone
310-859-0860
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Paradise Ranch Mhp

Is Paradise Ranch Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Paradise Ranch Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Paradise Ranch Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Nitrate, Barium, Copper, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Paradise Ranch Mhp serve?

Paradise Ranch Mhp reports serving 360 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Paradise Ranch Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 34 violations on file for Paradise Ranch Mhp, of which 25 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.