← California

Tap water quality report

Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept.

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 111 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

111
contaminants tested
27
detected
40,600
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-17

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0100 µg/L 14/15 2024
PFOA 0.0160 µg/L 14/15 2024
PFOS 0.0300 µg/L 14/15 2024
Pfhxa 0.0150 µg/L 13/15 2024
Pfpea 0.0170 µg/L 13/15 2024
Pfba 0.0140 µg/L 9/15 2024
Pfda 0.0056 µg/L 4/15 2024
Pfhpa 0.0041 µg/L 4/15 2024
PFHXS 0.0056 µg/L 4/15 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5900 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6400 µg/L
284/288 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.265 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
90/93 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
89/100 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
8.555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
84/100 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
81/100 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
73/88 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.52 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
73/88 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
4.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
62/92 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
39/39 LCR 2025
Fluoride
334 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
3.115 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
18/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
7.56175 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.642 µg/L
6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
6.64 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
3/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
219 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
3/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Heptachlor
0.0120 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 0.4000 µg/L
1/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.8 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1000000 µg/L 10000%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Trichloroethylene
0.5000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/122 SYR4 2012–2019
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NEGRETE, NOE
Phone
562-801-2346
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept.

Is Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept. tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept.'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept. serve?

Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept. reports serving 40,600 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept. had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Pico Rivera - City, Water Dept., of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.