Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 24.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 190/192 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 183/208 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 14.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 183/208 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 82.9 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 183/205 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 182/209 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 149/168 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 25 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 148/168 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 139/168 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 10 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 127/168 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 45/45 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 26/168 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.75 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 7/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 59.75 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 6/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 45 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/16 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
24 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Crescenta Valley Cwd
Is Crescenta Valley Cwd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Crescenta Valley Cwd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Crescenta Valley Cwd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Crescenta Valley Cwd serve?
Crescenta Valley Cwd reports serving 35,841 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Crescenta Valley Cwd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Crescenta Valley Cwd, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.