Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 95.319 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 113.04 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 64.76 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.9 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 22.105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.6 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 78.634 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97.82 µg/L | 57/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.677 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.37 µg/L | 55/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 38.495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.2 µg/L | 54/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.008 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.77 µg/L | 37/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 13/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 191 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 10/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L | 8/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.51 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 7/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 16.5625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.2 µg/L | 6/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 26 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Nitrate | 600 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company
Is Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company serve?
Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company reports serving 4,360 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Mt. Konocti Mutual Water Company, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.