Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Buckingham Park Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 71 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

71
contaminants tested
16
detected
1,521
people served
16
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
24
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-03-01 → 2013-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-01-01 → 2013-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-01-01 → 2013-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
89.52 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 111.04 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
74.2195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 96.22 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
37.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.9 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
70.115 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 81 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
41.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.6 µg/L
29/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.668 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.48 µg/L
25/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2025
Fluoride
193.5 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
6.6 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
9/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.9535 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
8/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
3/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
3/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
110 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
0.8100 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MITCHELL, ALAN
Phone
707-279-8568
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Buckingham Park Water District

Is Buckingham Park Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Buckingham Park Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Buckingham Park Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Buckingham Park Water District serve?

Buckingham Park Water District reports serving 1,521 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Buckingham Park Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Buckingham Park Water District, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.