← California

Tap water quality report

Highlands Mutual Water Company

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
17
detected
7,772
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
13
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
70.409 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 94.23 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
87.423 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 116.55 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
43.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.6 µg/L
69/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
68.36 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.9 µg/L
69/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
69/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
17.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L
57/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.6475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.07 µg/L
50/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
33/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
19/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2023
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
10/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.57 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
4/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2024
Barium
110 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromate
10.79 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
2/74 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.7775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L
2/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/69 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SISCO, RICHARD
Phone
707-994-8676
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Highlands Mutual Water Company

Is Highlands Mutual Water Company tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Highlands Mutual Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Highlands Mutual Water Company's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Highlands Mutual Water Company serve?

Highlands Mutual Water Company reports serving 7,772 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Highlands Mutual Water Company had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for Highlands Mutual Water Company, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.