← California

Tap water quality report

Mil Potrero Mwc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 53 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

53
contaminants tested
17
detected
2,200
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Kern

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
26
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-07-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-07-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
21 µg/L 210%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
426/535 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2931.1 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4068 µg/L
102/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
9.387 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.685 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2012–2014
Barium
116 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2017
Fluoride
1730 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1800 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0110 mg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
6.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
3.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
3.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Selenium
5.125 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2013–2017
TTHM
20.5 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.549 pCi/L 31%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.57 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.1 µg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2013–2017
Toluene
1.5 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2012–2014
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.3 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylbenzeneLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CARRUTH, JAMES R
Phone
661-242-3230
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mil Potrero Mwc

Is Mil Potrero Mwc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Mil Potrero Mwc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mil Potrero Mwc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mil Potrero Mwc serve?

Mil Potrero Mwc reports serving 2,200 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Mil Potrero Mwc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Mil Potrero Mwc, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.