Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Angels, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 85 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

85
contaminants tested
16
detected
3,836
people served
9
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Calaveras

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
23
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31
RPT Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
70.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97.05 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
74 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 101.67 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
34.425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.8 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
58.225 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.099 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.62 µg/L
42/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 42/42 LCR 2023
Nitrate
3100 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
6/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
380 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L
5/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
158300 µg/L 1583%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170000 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
10.935 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.5265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5270 µg/L
2/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
2.5 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
7.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/46 SYR4 2013–2019
69 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaLassoLeadMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HODSON, MICHAEL
Phone
209-736-2181
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Angels, City of

Is Angels, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Angels, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Angels, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Angels, City of serve?

Angels, City of reports serving 3,836 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Angels, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Angels, City of, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.