← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Epcor - San Tan Anthem

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
18
detected
10,362
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Pinal

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
54
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0067 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFBS 0.0240 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfhpa 0.0046 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfhxa 0.0220 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFOA 0.0190 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0400 µg/L 2/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
162.5 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
36/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
5010 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5400 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
4.4 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Arsenic
2.91 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
22 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
1.97 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
545.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
7.845 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
4/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
110 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
4348 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4420 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.785 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
2/22 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HOSKIN, JULIE
Phone
602-722-4100
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Epcor - San Tan Anthem

Is Epcor - San Tan Anthem tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Epcor - San Tan Anthem's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Epcor - San Tan Anthem's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, TTHM, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Epcor - San Tan Anthem serve?

Epcor - San Tan Anthem reports serving 10,362 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Epcor - San Tan Anthem had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 54 violations on file for Epcor - San Tan Anthem, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.