Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 5171.5 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5300 µg/L | 68/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 232.4 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1350 µg/L | 25/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 33.38 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.1 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 25.6 µg/L 171% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 52 µg/L | 13/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.84 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L | 13/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 5133.5 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5210 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Xylenes, Total | 2.125 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 6/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5.48 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 42.6 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Fluoride | 586 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 590 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Chromium | 1.295 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.5900 pCi/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 pCi/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Chlorobenzene | 0.6000 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.5900 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert
Is Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, TTHM, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert serve?
Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert reports serving 4,568 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.
Has Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 97 violations on file for Marana Municipal - Airline Lambert, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.