← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Metropolitan Dwid

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
23
detected
45,570
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Pima

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
874
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-07-11 → 2004-07-10
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-12-01 → 1991-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0048 µg/L 4/42 2025
PFHXS 0.0039 µg/L 2/42 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
4000 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5000 µg/L
620/620 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
190 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
6.9 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
88/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.14 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
63/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3400 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4600 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
4.715 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
40/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
2.28 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
25/33 SYR4 2013–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.585 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L
24/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
178 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
23/33 SYR4 2013–2018
Lithium
18.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
19/42 UCMR-5 2025
Fluoride
372 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
13/33 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
0.00057 mg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2025
Xylenes, Total
6.88 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
9/164 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
2.72 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
9/164 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.25 pCi/L 25%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.4 pCi/L
6/46 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
4.025 µg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
4/33 SYR4 2013–2018
Ethylbenzene
1.227 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
3/164 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.39 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
3/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.87 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
2/33 SYR4 2013–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.7600 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/74 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrite
260 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/61 SYR4 2013–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
OLSEN, JOSEPH
Phone
520-209-2842
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Metropolitan Dwid

Is Metropolitan Dwid tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Metropolitan Dwid's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Metropolitan Dwid's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, TTHM, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Metropolitan Dwid serve?

Metropolitan Dwid reports serving 45,570 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Metropolitan Dwid had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 874 violations on file for Metropolitan Dwid, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.