← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Pima Utilities

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
17
detected
20,000
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Maricopa

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
259
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-02-01 → 1999-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5553.5 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6730 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
121.9 µg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L
98/102 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
5495 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6730 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
6.8 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0100 mg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.7 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
7/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
69.5 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
11.75 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
817.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
381 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 UCMR-5 2025
Lead
4.78 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
5/102 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
8.9 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
9.59 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8000 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/11 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2019
93 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HANSON, JUSTIN G
Phone
480-895-5009
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pima Utilities

Is Pima Utilities tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Pima Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pima Utilities's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, TTHM, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pima Utilities serve?

Pima Utilities reports serving 20,000 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Pima Utilities had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 259 violations on file for Pima Utilities, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.