Tap WaterIndex

← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Goodyear Water Department

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
24
detected
50,001
people served
4
health-based violations
Arizona rankingsLead in ArizonaPFAS in Arizona
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Maricopa

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
409
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1987-01-01 → 1992-01-01
MCL Health-based Archived 1987-01-01 → 1992-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0130 µg/L 5/14 2024
PFHXS 0.0061 µg/L 2/14 2024
PFNA 0.0043 µg/L 2/14 2024
PFOA 0.0048 µg/L 2/14 2024
PFOS 0.0079 µg/L 2/14 2024
Pfpea 0.0037 µg/L 2/14 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9135 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10000 µg/L
314/314 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
56 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 96 µg/L
154/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.18 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
142/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
10.9 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
103/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
300 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 387 µg/L
93/96 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
9128 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10000 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroethylene
1.28 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
25/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2025
Lead
12.52 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
17/96 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
163.5 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
24.4 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1975 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
335 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 14/14 UCMR-5 2024
Combined Uranium
6.62 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.26 pCi/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.3 pCi/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.16 pCi/L 23%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.3 pCi/L
5/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.4515 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/51 SYR4 2012–2019
2,4-D
0.1200 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
 1/37 SYR4 2013–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HALL, JOSH H
Phone
623-693-0171
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Goodyear Water Department

Is Goodyear Water Department tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Goodyear Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Goodyear Water Department's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Arsenic, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Goodyear Water Department serve?

Goodyear Water Department reports serving 50,001 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Goodyear Water Department had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 409 violations on file for Goodyear Water Department, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.