← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Globe City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
20
detected
7,536
people served
19
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Gila

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
841
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-01-19
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0091 µg/L 2/6 2023
PFBS 0.1133 µg/L 2/6 2023
PFHXS 0.0237 µg/L 2/6 2023
PFOS 0.0095 µg/L 2/6 2023
Pfpes 0.0046 µg/L 1/6 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
268.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
94/95 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
6600 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
11.5 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
35/95 SYR4 2013–2017
TTHM
12.725 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
16/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
41.15 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
6365 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6400 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00064 mg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.0725 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
6/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
308 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 UCMR-5 2023
Fluoride
412 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
5.16 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
3.6 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
2.62 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2014
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.785 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.8 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2014
Tetrachloroethylene
0.6000 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MARTIN, JODI
Phone
928-425-7146
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Globe City of

Is Globe City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Globe City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Globe City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Globe City of serve?

Globe City of reports serving 7,536 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Globe City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 841 violations on file for Globe City of, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.