← Arizona

Tap water quality report

Page City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
13
detected
7,420
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Coconino

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
165
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2022-12-18
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-07-01 → 2012-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1000 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
82.9 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.2 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
62.5 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
466.5 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L
28/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.34 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
19/70 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
462.5 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L
6/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
50.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
1.47 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
106.5 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
308 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 310 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
0.0190 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5000 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WOOD, MATTHEW
Phone
928-645-2419
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Page City of

Is Page City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Page City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Page City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Page City of serve?

Page City of reports serving 7,420 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.

Has Page City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 165 violations on file for Page City of, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.