Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-02-01 → 2008-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 213 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L | 95/96 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1905 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8200 µg/L | 80/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.275 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 44/96 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 18.02 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 39/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2025 |
| Arsenic | 1.755 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 135.5 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1791 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1800 µg/L | 10/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 13.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 1330 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.77 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 7/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 4.525 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Chromium | 1.385 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.3 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Us Army Fort Huachuca
Is Us Army Fort Huachuca tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Us Army Fort Huachuca's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Us Army Fort Huachuca's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Us Army Fort Huachuca serve?
Us Army Fort Huachuca reports serving 15,603 people in Arizona, per its EPA record.
Has Us Army Fort Huachuca had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 959 violations on file for Us Army Fort Huachuca, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.