Is Neapwa Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Randolph

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Fluoride	969 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 1110 µg/L	103/103	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	6.27 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L	63/63	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	42.56 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 57.9 µg/L	63/63	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	17.42 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L	53/53	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	39.18 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 62.6 µg/L	53/53	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	23.16 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L	53/53	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	48.4 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 62.7 µg/L	51/51	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	624.5 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 920 µg/L	38/38	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	1.55 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L	31/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	650 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.29 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L	3/53	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.59 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L	3/53	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.03 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L	3/53	SYR4	2012–2019

64 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: JANSEN, JOSEPH
Phone: 870-248-0617
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Neapwa

Is Neapwa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Neapwa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Neapwa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Neapwa serve?

Neapwa reports serving 25 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Neapwa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Neapwa.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.