Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-09-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 88.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 101 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 31.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 95.69 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 70.05 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.8 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 35.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.3 µg/L | 54/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 316 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4600 µg/L | 23/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L | 23/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 50.7 µg/L 338% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 148 µg/L | 15/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 4/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
32 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Beaverfork Pwa
Is Beaverfork Pwa tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Beaverfork Pwa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Beaverfork Pwa's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Beaverfork Pwa serve?
Beaverfork Pwa reports serving 4,220 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.
Has Beaverfork Pwa had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 56 violations on file for Beaverfork Pwa, of which 46 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.