Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-12-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-12-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0110 mg/L 73% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2002 |
| Copper | 158 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 5/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 13.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.3 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 1.88 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 4/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| TTHM | 19.16 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.01 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.61639 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
4 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Victoria Water Association
Is Victoria Water Association tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Victoria Water Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Victoria Water Association's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Chloroform, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Victoria Water Association serve?
Victoria Water Association reports serving 33 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.
Has Victoria Water Association had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Victoria Water Association, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.