Is Greenbrier Waterworks Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Faulkner

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	6.82 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L	55/56	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	73.54 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 89.3 µg/L	55/56	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	79.45 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 95.9 µg/L	55/56	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	68.09 µg/L 113% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 78.1 µg/L	55/55	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	35.61 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 41.3 µg/L	55/55	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	31.555 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 34.2 µg/L	54/55	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	310 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 550 µg/L	43/60	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	11.94 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L	33/60	SYR4	2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L	26/55	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	18/18	LCR	2025
Dibromochloromethane	1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L	3/56	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	4.2 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/55	SYR4	2012–2019

32 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: HUBBARD, JAKE
Phone: 501-581-1099
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Greenbrier Waterworks

Is Greenbrier Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Greenbrier Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Greenbrier Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Greenbrier Waterworks serve?

Greenbrier Waterworks reports serving 12,938 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Greenbrier Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 84 violations on file for Greenbrier Waterworks, of which 82 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.