← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

Alma Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
18
detected
6,123
people served
42
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Crawford

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

42
health-based violations
45
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.915 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
65.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 82.8 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
55/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
34.88 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.6 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
77.475 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.6 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1031 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1220 µg/L
34/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromate
4.14 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
33/96 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
577 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2330 µg/L
24/41 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Lead
76.35 µg/L 509%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 207 µg/L
14/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
11/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1326 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1690 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
830 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/58 SYR4 2012–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
YARDLEY, MARK
Phone
479-632-2254
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Alma Waterworks

Is Alma Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Alma Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Alma Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Alma Waterworks serve?

Alma Waterworks reports serving 6,123 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Alma Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 45 violations on file for Alma Waterworks, of which 42 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.