Tap WaterIndex

← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Mid-Central Water Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 3 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

3
contaminants tested
3
detected
2,325
people served
58
health-based violations
Alabama rankingsLead in AlabamaPFAS in Alabama
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clarke

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

58
health-based violations
60
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
94.755 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 135 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
81.155 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.8 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 18/18 LCR 2023

Utility contact

Contact
NORRIS, MIKE
Phone
334-636-5092
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mid-Central Water Authority

Is Mid-Central Water Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Mid-Central Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mid-Central Water Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mid-Central Water Authority serve?

Mid-Central Water Authority reports serving 2,325 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Mid-Central Water Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Mid-Central Water Authority, of which 58 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.