← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Alabaster Water Department, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
19
detected
40,986
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Shelby

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
132
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
TT Health-based Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31
TT Health-based Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0850 µg/L 10/14 2025
PFOS 0.0190 µg/L 8/14 2025
PFOA 0.0210 µg/L 6/14 2025
Pfba 0.0140 µg/L 5/14 2025
Pfhxa 0.0190 µg/L 5/14 2025
Pfpea 0.0330 µg/L 5/14 2025
Pfhpa 0.0065 µg/L 3/14 2025
PFHXS 0.0034 µg/L 1/14 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
77.505 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91.4 µg/L
144/160 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.615 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
132/160 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1172.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
Chloroform
1.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.38 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.47 pCi/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1095.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1130 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.5870 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5900 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
76 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.7000 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Lithium
12.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/14 UCMR-5 2025
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HAWKINS, FRED
Phone
205-664-6823
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Alabaster Water Department, City of

Is Alabaster Water Department, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Alabaster Water Department, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Alabaster Water Department, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, PFBS, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Alabaster Water Department, City of serve?

Alabaster Water Department, City of reports serving 40,986 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Alabaster Water Department, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 132 violations on file for Alabaster Water Department, City of, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.