Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-11 → 2023-05-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-11 → 2023-05-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 320 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 560 µg/L | 21/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0016 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 71.7 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.9 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 250 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 17.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L | 9/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 18.315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L | 8/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.6 µg/L | 7/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.48 µg/L | 6/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 227 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 16.38 µg/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 3/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.16 pCi/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.2 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2017 |
| Fluoride | 390 µg/L 9.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kushla Water District
Is Kushla Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Kushla Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kushla Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kushla Water District serve?
Kushla Water District reports serving 6,294 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.
Has Kushla Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 68 violations on file for Kushla Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.