← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Smiths Water & Sewer Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
18
detected
33,555
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
25
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-11
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0044 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0057 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOA 0.0059 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOS 0.0063 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0062 µg/L 4/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
859.8 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 975 µg/L
182/188 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
80.48 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L
165/165 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.06 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.4 µg/L
165/165 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
73.15 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L
30/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00051 mg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1090 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
902.5 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 920 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1083 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1090 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.8545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.09 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
9.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.08 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
3.634 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.78 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
3.17 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
2/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.2000 pCi/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MORRIS, ANDY
Phone
334-297-8362
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Smiths Water & Sewer Authority

Is Smiths Water & Sewer Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Smiths Water & Sewer Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Smiths Water & Sewer Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Smiths Water & Sewer Authority serve?

Smiths Water & Sewer Authority reports serving 33,555 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Smiths Water & Sewer Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 25 violations on file for Smiths Water & Sewer Authority, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.