← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
21
detected
44,637
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Etowah

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
130
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1990-04-01 → 1990-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1990-04-01 → 1990-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1989-10-01 → 1989-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1989-10-01 → 1989-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1989-08-01 → 1989-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1989-08-01 → 1989-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-05-18 → 2023-08-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-05-18 → 2023-08-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-05-18 → 2023-08-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-05-18 → 2023-08-27

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0191 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFBS 0.1554 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhpa 0.0117 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0349 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOA 0.0320 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOS 0.0324 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0565 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0042 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
54.12 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 107 µg/L
433/433 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24.98 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.2 µg/L
433/433 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0025 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2024
Nitrate
340 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
54.8 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
9/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.853 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
15.515 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.438 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.55 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
326 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1013 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1130 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
50.35 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.0385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.06 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1 pCi/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HARE, CHAD
Phone
256-543-2884
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of

Is Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Nitrate, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of serve?

Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of reports serving 44,637 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 130 violations on file for Gadsden, the Wwsb of the City of, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.