← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
14
detected
21,834
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dallas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
76
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
63.15 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
140/163 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
17.99 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.6 µg/L
87/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.612 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.9 µg/L
33/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
28/28 LCR 2025
Lead
22 µg/L 147%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
21/163 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
1900 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
479.4 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 483 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
912 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 920 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
202.5 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.6 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.9 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2019
Chloroform
1.1655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
0.6400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
0.5300 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
10.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 UCMR-5 2025
90 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MOSS, III, JOHNNY
Phone
334-874-8857
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of

Is Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of serve?

Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of reports serving 21,834 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 76 violations on file for Selma, the Ww and Sb of the City of, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.