← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Colbert County Rural Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
25
detected
13,395
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Colbert

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
157
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0085 µg/L 21/26 2024
PFOS 0.0295 µg/L 21/26 2024
Pfba 0.0377 µg/L 19/26 2024
Pfhxa 0.0120 µg/L 19/26 2024
PFOA 0.0198 µg/L 16/26 2024
Pfpea 0.0051 µg/L 15/26 2024
PFHXS 0.0038 µg/L 6/26 2024
Pfhpa 0.0043 µg/L 3/26 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
61.9 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L
263/263 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
46.95 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.7 µg/L
263/263 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorite
668.8 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 839 µg/L
158/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00052 mg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2023
Barium
24.33 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 24.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
23.125 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
555 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.346 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.43 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.938 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
783.25 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 784 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
534.7 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 555 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.1115 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.5500 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorobenzene
1.28 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
2 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
1.6 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ROBINSON, JEREMY
Phone
256-381-2120
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Colbert County Rural Water

Is Colbert County Rural Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Colbert County Rural Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Colbert County Rural Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chlorite, PFBS, PFOS, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Colbert County Rural Water serve?

Colbert County Rural Water reports serving 13,395 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Colbert County Rural Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 157 violations on file for Colbert County Rural Water, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.