Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 139.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 68.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 155.175 µg/L 194% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 178.5 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 149.22 µg/L 249% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 307.2 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 27/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 90 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 21/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 109.15 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.628 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 13/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 167.897 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 239 µg/L | 7/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.814 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 5/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 47.5505 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 440 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Toluene | 1.2715 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.4 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Lead | 2.2 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Styrene | 0.6900 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
23 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Nsbu - Point Hope
Is Nsbu - Point Hope tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Nsbu - Point Hope's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Nsbu - Point Hope's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Nsbu - Point Hope serve?
Nsbu - Point Hope reports serving 881 people in Alaska, per its EPA record.
Has Nsbu - Point Hope had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 303 violations on file for Nsbu - Point Hope, of which 65 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.