← Alaska

Tap water quality report

Victoria Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 37 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

37
contaminants tested
5
detected
912
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
145
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-10-08
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-07-21
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2005-10-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2001-03-01 → 2001-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2001-02-01 → 2001-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2001-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2001-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2001-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
473.85 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 547 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2410 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.553 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.59 µg/L
15/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Barium
17.5 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
32 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideMercurySeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GARZA, FRED
Phone
907-376-1984
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Victoria Estates

Is Victoria Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Victoria Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Victoria Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Lead, Barium. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Victoria Estates serve?

Victoria Estates reports serving 912 people in Alaska, per its EPA record.

Has Victoria Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 145 violations on file for Victoria Estates, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.