Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-02-01 → 2014-02-28 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 63.2 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 54.425 µg/L 91% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0050 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2022 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs
Is Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs serve?
Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs reports serving 11,268 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Red Hawk Casino - Shingle Springs, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.