Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 57.775 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.7 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.1 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 797.5 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2016–2017 |
| Lead | 6.945 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2016–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.3569 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3700 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Barium | 37.175 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.7 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Fluoride | 755 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.4475 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.74 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.7 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline
Is Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline serve?
Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline reports serving 25 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Mni Wiconi Wtp / Coreline, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.