← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

New Town, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 66 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

66
contaminants tested
19
detected
2,528
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
68.475 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 138 µg/L
16/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
40 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
11.6075 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.72 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
7.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.67 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.066 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.64 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2023
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.076 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.32 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
4.3575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.52 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
2.816 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.82 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
3.7 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
1.5 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.2000 pCi/L 4%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Combined Uranium
-0.28 µg/L -0.9%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Dibromochloromethane
1.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Fluoride
1090 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Pentachlorophenol
0.0400 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2017
Styrene
0.5900 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2013–2017
47 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidPicloramSeleniumSimazineTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ZAUN, EILEEN
Phone
701-627-4812
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about New Town, City of

Is New Town, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in New Town, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Town, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Town, City of serve?

New Town, City of reports serving 2,528 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has New Town, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for New Town, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.