Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Dakota Magic Casino

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 72 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

72
contaminants tested
16
detected
2,360
people served
5
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
313
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-05-01 → 2002-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2025
Arsenic
15.075 µg/L 151%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2016–2019
Copper
608.65 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 664 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
9.625 pCi/L 64%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 9.7 pCi/L
6/6 SYR4 2015–2017
Combined Uranium
7.98 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2015–2017
Nitrate
440 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
23.965 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.2395 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.67 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.7245 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7300 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
431 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 440 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
18 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Chromium
5.1 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/7 SYR4 2015–2017
Mercury
0.1300 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Nitrite
9 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
0.8300 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
56 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LIMON, FELIPE CASKE
Phone
701-634-3000
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Dakota Magic Casino

Is Dakota Magic Casino tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Dakota Magic Casino's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dakota Magic Casino's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Arsenic, Copper, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dakota Magic Casino serve?

Dakota Magic Casino reports serving 2,360 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Dakota Magic Casino had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 313 violations on file for Dakota Magic Casino, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.