Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Parshall-Lucky Mound

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 5 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

5
contaminants tested
5
detected
720
people served
2
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Federal government

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-03-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1652 µg/L 127%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2160 µg/L
73/73 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
8.668 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
19/73 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
83.634 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.89 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
63.71 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.83 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2025

Utility contact

Contact
SILVERIA, JOSEPH
Phone
701-627-8181
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Parshall-Lucky Mound

Is Parshall-Lucky Mound tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Parshall-Lucky Mound's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Parshall-Lucky Mound's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Parshall-Lucky Mound serve?

Parshall-Lucky Mound reports serving 720 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Parshall-Lucky Mound had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Parshall-Lucky Mound, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.