Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 228.4 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L | 29/30 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0070 mg/L 47% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2026 |
| TTHM | 65.5 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.4 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 20.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fort Kipp Subdivision Water
Is Fort Kipp Subdivision Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Fort Kipp Subdivision Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fort Kipp Subdivision Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fort Kipp Subdivision Water serve?
Fort Kipp Subdivision Water reports serving 130 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Fort Kipp Subdivision Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Fort Kipp Subdivision Water, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.