Tap WaterIndex

← New Mexico

Tap water quality report

Jicarilla Dulce

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
14
detected
3,064
people served
325
health-based violations
New Mexico rankingsLead in New MexicoPFAS in New Mexico
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

325
health-based violations
591
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-05-01 → 2019-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
54.73 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.3 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.345 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
51.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 32/32 LCR 2023
Copper
462.35 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 488 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
6.539 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.61 µg/L
19/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.076 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.16 µg/L
7/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.77 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.5314 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5320 µg/L
2/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
19 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.37 pCi/L 27%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
110 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Adrian Notsinneh
Phone
5757594204
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Jicarilla Dulce

Is Jicarilla Dulce tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Jicarilla Dulce's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Jicarilla Dulce's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Jicarilla Dulce serve?

Jicarilla Dulce reports serving 3,064 people in New Mexico, per its EPA record.

Has Jicarilla Dulce had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 591 violations on file for Jicarilla Dulce, of which 325 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.