Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-02-24 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 195.45 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 278 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 36.09 µg/L 241% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 202 µg/L | 28/50 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 24.8 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 17.19 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 19/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0285 mg/L 190% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 430 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 10.325 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 422.5 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.0685 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.11 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 97.5 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.4773 pCi/L 9.8% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.55 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.0400 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.5700 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Grand Portage
Is Grand Portage tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Grand Portage's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Grand Portage's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Grand Portage serve?
Grand Portage reports serving 820 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Grand Portage had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2011 violations on file for Grand Portage, of which 71 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.